The competition, called offered free computers and a cash prize to anyone who could hack into an Apple, Microsoft or Linux computer placed in public view at the conference. The first was held at a Hackers conference called CanSecWest in 2008. There has only been a couple of “level playing field” competitions comparing the security of Linux with Microsoft and Apple. It is nothing at all like the NSA Key which allows the NSA to directly access the Microsoft Windows operating system and change programs inside of your computer. Moreover, it is only one of eight different security modules which protects the Linux core. However, this module is simply a “permissions” system which itself has three levels of permissions to gain access to the Linux core. This has been misreported in the press as indicating that the NSA somehow controls Linux. In 2001, the NSA developed a security module which was eventually incorporated as one of 8 security modules available in the Linux core. Because different “families” of Linux operating systems uses different combinations of walls, the diversity of Linux operating systems makes it difficult for hackers to break into a Linux computer.ĭoesn’t Linux use a security system developed by the NSA?
The Linux operating system consists of a “core” which is surrounded by up to 8 security modules.Įven if a hacker is able to break through one of the security walls, they simply run into another security wall. The result is that Linux uses eight different “security modules' which protect your computer from hacker attacks.
#Data rescue ii 1.2 1 software#
They are free to write simple codes that are easier to make compatible with other software and run faster in your computer.
#Data rescue ii 1.2 1 code#
Open source programs like Linux do not have to worry about bloating their programs with complex code intended solely to maintain a monopoly. You build a better community by empowering everyone in the community. Linus explained that open source program development creates more branches to the tree which leads to more checks and balances, better decisions, more efficient merging of new ideas and a stronger, faster and more secure program. In a 2007 presentation, Linus Torvalds, the originator of Linux, used the following diagram to illustrate the difference between open source and closed source program development:
They then share these solutions with others and the whole community benefits and moves forward in a rapid cycle of innovation – all due to a developmental model which encourages multiple points of view. Meanwhile, open source is bottom up in that programmers are coming up with solutions for their own problems. They are set up to actively discourage change and innovation. The top mainly want to protect the status quo. Throughout history, very little innovation has come from the top down. Open Source is a more secure developmental modelĪ second reason open source is more secure than Microsoft is that it is a bottom up, community driven development model rather than a top down corporate driven development model. The primary reason Linux is more secure than Windows is that Linux does not have an open back door so nobody other than you can modify your computer. Microsoft has done such a terrible job with security that it is not really a fair comparison.”īruce Schneier Open Source and Security 1999 “Comparing the security of Linux with that of Microsoft Windows is not very instructive.
0 kommentar(er)
